Invicti is a mature, enterprise application security platform. Auditon takes a different approach: one assessment across the application and the services behind it, reports that show exactly what ran, and published pricing about 40% lower. Here's where each one fits.
Based on public product information and standard report output. Features vary by edition, so check the details against your own setup.
| Area | AUDITON | INVICTI |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment scope | The web application plus the services behind it: ports, SSH, SMB, SNMP, TLS, domain mail security, and version-based CVE lookup, in one assessment. STRONGER | Application security platform: DAST, API security, SAST, SCA, and attack surface management as separate products. |
| What ran, and what didn't | Every report lists each tool and stage as completed, skipped, failed, or timed out, with the reason. Gaps are visible, not implied. STRONGER | Reports list the enabled security checks and scan settings, such as policy, scope, duration, and request count. |
| From findings to fixes | A prioritised remediation plan grouped by fix, with compliance references to OWASP, PCI DSS 4.0, and ISO 27001 per finding. STRONGER | Detailed remedy guidance and external references per finding, with issue-tracker integrations. |
| Tracking over time | Recurring assessments from daily to quarterly, with drift between scans, time to fix and SLA adherence by severity, finding age, and risk-accepted exceptions in your client workspace. | Vulnerability management and retesting inside the platform. |
| Evidence | Structured evidence and scanner confidence where supplied. Raw request and response data is withheld from published reports. | Full HTTP request and response per finding, and proof-based confirmation of exploitable issues. STRONGER |
| Authenticated scanning | Supplied bearer token or session cookie, with session checks throughout the scan. No form login or MFA handling yet. | Multiple authentication methods, including form-based login. STRONGER |
| Standards mapping | CVE, CWE, CVSS 3.1, OWASP, PCI DSS 4.0, and ISO 27001 Annex A references per finding. Compliance summary table with scope disclaimer in every report. STRONGER | Broad mapping, including OWASP, CWE, ISO 27001, NIST, DISA STIG, and CVSS 4.0. |
| How it's delivered | Assessments run with you, published to a client workspace with downloadable HTML reports. | A self-service platform with a large catalog of CI/CD and ticketing integrations. |
| Pricing | From $250 per endpoint a month, falling to $30 at volume: about 40% below reported Invicti pricing for the same targets. Published on the pricing section. STRONGER | Quote-based, licensed per FQDN. Reported at $4,000–6,000 per target a year for Standard, more for Premium (Vendr). |
Send the targets you scan today and, if you like, a recent report from your current scanner.
Auditon runs against the same scope, with the same access, so the comparison is fair.
Review coverage, reporting detail, and cost together. The decision stays yours.
Yes. Netsparker is now called Invicti. If you are comparing against an older Netsparker setup, the same comparison applies.
For many teams that need regular web application and infrastructure assessments with detailed reports, yes. If you rely on proof-based confirmation, self-service CI/CD scanning, or form login and MFA handling, Invicti may still be the better fit today.
Yes. Send your scope and a recent report, and we will scan the same target so you can compare coverage, reporting detail, and cost side by side.
Bring your current scope. We'll show you what Auditon finds.
Get a tailored quote ↗Back to the Auditon homepage ↗Invicti and Netsparker are trademarks of their respective owners. Auditon is not affiliated with or endorsed by Invicti Security. This comparison is based on publicly available information as of September 2026. Features vary by edition and change over time, so confirm details with each vendor.